DU Mobile Apps
World Leader in Wetlands Conservation

Fueling the Engines

Feeding and digestion in waterfowl
PAGE 12
SIGN IN    SAVE TO MY DU    PRINT    AAA
  • photo by Tom Reichner
Image of

By Keith McKnight, Ph.D.

Natural selection dictates that the fittest individuals (i.e., those best at survival and reproduction) dominate the population, while those less adept at making a living contribute less to the gene pool, or are eventually eliminated altogether. Fundamental to this concept is the notion that the physical and behavioral attributes of the animals we see today are well matched to the environmental challenges they face.

For wildlife, the basic challenges are simple-survive and reproduce. However, the intricacies of survival and reproduction in birds are nothing short of amazing. Nowhere is this more evident than in the interplay among foraging, flight and reproduction in waterfowl.

Many aspects of a duck's physical and physiological machinery are adapted to flight. Wings and feathers are clearly adaptations for flight, but other features may not be so obvious. For example, the energy requirements of flight are high. As a result, ducks and geese must have ready access to habitats with sufficient food sources, and must consume hefty volumes of food while there.

Eating is only part of the battle, though. To extract nutrients from food items, ducks and geese must be able to efficiently and effectively digest them. Just as with many other vertebrates, the digestion process begins with physical grinding. To accomplish this, waterfowl (in fact all birds) use their gizzard, not teeth. This, believe it or not, is an adaptation for flight. The jawbone structure and teeth required to grind food in the mouth result in a substantial amount of weight located in the front end of the body. This causes some problems with in-flight balance. Maneuverability in flight requires an even distribution of body weight.

This is achieved in birds by centralizing heavy structures, such as the gizzard, in the body cavity. So in essence the gizzard serves as a centrally located set of teeth. Because there is no sense in carrying around unnecessary weight, we find that gizzard size in waterfowl is closely related to the nature and/or volume of food eaten. This is most notable among species where consumers of relatively fibrous foods such as seeds and leafy vegetation (mallards, gadwalls, pintails) possess larger gizzards than do fish eaters, such as mergansers.

Other diet-related physical characteristics in waterfowl are more conspicuous. The most recognizable of these is bill shape and size. Most waterfowl observers have noticed the substantial (almost comical) difference between the bill of a merganser and a northern shoveler. The serrated pincer-like bill of mergansers is an effective fish grabber, whereas the shoveler's bill functions like a great scoop and sieve. Snow and Ross's goose bills are short and stout; ideal for digging and muscling out below-ground plant parts like rhizomes and tubers. The significantly longer and more slender Canada goose bill, on the other hand, is better suited for grasping and snipping above-ground plant parts such as blades of grass.

PAGE 12
SIGN IN    SAVE TO MY DU    PRINT    AAA

Free DU Decal

Receive a free DU decal when you signup for our free monthly newsletter.

  DU is a Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity DU Holds a 4-Star Rating with Charity Navigator